Impact of Biomass Particle Morphology on Pyrolysis and Gasification Processes: Insights from TGA and Reaction Kinetics

Authors

  • Shaon Md Tariqur Rahman Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia , Military Institute of Science and Technology image/svg+xml
    • Conceptualization
    • Methodology
    • Data Curation
    • Formal Analysis
    • Visualization
    • Validation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

  • Md Mahabubur Rahman Sharon Khulna University of Engineering and Technology image/svg+xml
      Competing Interests

      The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    • Altab Hossain Military Institute of Science and Technology image/svg+xml
        Competing Interests

        The authors declare that they have no competing interests. 

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.47981/j.mijst.14(01)2026.603(21-38)

      Keywords:

      Biomass, Pyrolysis, Gasification, Particle sizes, Particle shape, Thermogravimetric Analysis

      Abstract

      This study investigates the influence of biomass particle size and shape on pyrolysis and gasification of pine wood in a laboratory-scale fixed-bed reactor. Biomass particles have been categorized into fine, medium, coarse, and large size ranges and shaped into spherical, cylindrical, flaky, and irregular geometries. Pyrolysis has been conducted at temperatures up to 800°C under nitrogen, while gasification has been performed at 800–1200°C in a CO₂-steam mixture. Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) has been employed to monitor weight loss and heat flow. The findings have revealed that smaller, spherical particles significantly enhance decomposition rates, achieving higher gasification efficiencies at lower temperatures. These particles have produced hydrogen-rich syngas with an H₂/CO ratio of 1.1, while larger, irregular particles have favored carbon monoxide generation. Emission analysis has demonstrated that fine particles have reduced NOx, SO₂, and CO₂ emissions by up to 85%, 80%, and 70%, respectively. Kinetic analysis has shown that smaller particles require lower activation energy (31.23 kJ mol−¹) compared to larger particles (39.52 kJ mol−¹). This study emphasizes the critical influence of biomass particle size and geometry in optimizing reactor design, improving conversion efficiency, and minimizing environmental impacts. Unlike prior studies that vary particle size alone, this work simultaneously resolves the combined effects of particle size (four classes) and shape (four geometries) using TGA quantification, thereby filling a critical gap in the literature on size- and shape-resolved biomass conversion kinetics. These findings directly inform feedstock preparation protocols for optimizing fixed-bed reactor performance in bioenergy applications.  

      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.

      Author Biographies

      • Md Mahabubur Rahman Sharon, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology

        BSc Student, Department of Textile Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (KUET)

      • Altab Hossain, Military Institute of Science and Technology

        Instructor Class ‘A’ (Associate Professor), Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering (NSE), Military institute of Science and Technology (MIST)

      References

      Acharya, B., Dutta, A., & Basu, P. (2010). An investigation into steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen enriched gas production in presence of CaO. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(4), 1582–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.109

      Bridgwater, A. V. (2012). Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass and Bioenergy, 38, 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048

      Chuayboon, S., Abanades, S., & Rodat, S. (2019). Insights into the influence of biomass feedstock type, particle size and feeding rate on thermochemical performances of a continuous solar gasification reactor. Renewable Energy, 130, 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.065

      Diblasi, C. (2008). Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(1), 47–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001

      Ding, L., Gong, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, F., & Yu, G. (2017). Characterisation of the morphological changes and interactions in char, slag and ash during CO 2 gasification of rice straw and lignite. Applied Energy, 195, 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.098

      Gao, Y., Wang, M., Raheem, A., Wang, F., Wei, J., Xu, D., Song, X., Bao, W., Huang, A., Zhang, S., & Zhang, H. (2023). Syngas Production from Biomass Gasification: Influences of Feedstock Properties, Reactor Type, and Reaction Parameters. ACS Omega, 8(35), 31620–31631. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03050

      Gaston, K. R., Jarvis, M. W., Pepiot, P., Smith, K. M., Frederick, W. J., & Nimlos, M. R. (2011). Biomass Pyrolysis and Gasification of Varying Particle Sizes in a Fluidized-Bed Reactor. Energy & Fuels, 25(8), 3747–3757. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200257k

      Jin, H., Lu, Y., Guo, L., Cao, C., & Zhang, X. (2010). Hydrogen production by partial oxidative gasification of biomass and its model compounds in supercritical water. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(7), 3001–3010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.059

      Kibria, Md. G., Paul, U. K., Hasan, A., Mohtasim, Md. S., Das, B. K., & Mourshed, M. (2024). Current prospects and challenges for biomass energy conversion in Bangladesh: Attaining sustainable development goals. Biomass and Bioenergy, 183, 107139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107139

      Kubay, H. H., & Akyürek, Z. (2025). The effect of additives on particulate matter and gaseous emissions from combustion and oxy-fuel combustion of a biofuel blend composed of poultry manure and pine wood chips. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-35955-x

      Lee, X. J., Ong, H. C., Gan, Y. Y., Chen, W.-H., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2020). State of art review on conventional and advanced pyrolysis of macroalgae and microalgae for biochar, bio-oil and bio-syngas production. Energy Conversion and Management, 210, 112707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112707

      Liu, Z., Zhang, F.-S., & Wu, J. (2010). Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment. Fuel, 89(2), 510–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.042

      Luo, S., Xiao, B., Guo, X., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & He, M. (2009). Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass in a fixed bed reactor: Influence of particle size on gasification performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(3), 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.10.088

      Luo, S., Xiao, B., Hu, Z., & Liu, S. (2010). Effect of particle size on pyrolysis of single-component municipal solid waste in fixed bed reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(1), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.048

      Matsumoto, K. (2024). An entrained flow biomass gasification technology with the fluidized bed concept for low-carbon fuel production. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 20, 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2024.100292

      McKendry, P. (2002). Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology, 83(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00118-3

      Naqvi, S. R., Jamshaid, S., Naqvi, M., Farooq, W., Niazi, M. B. K., Aman, Z., Zubair, M., Ali, M., Shahbaz, M., Inayat, A., & Afzal, W. (2018). Potential of biomass for bioenergy in Pakistan based on present case and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.012

      Pang, S. (2019). Advances in thermochemical conversion of woody biomass to energy, fuels and chemicals. Biotechnology Advances, 37(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.004

      Paudel, P. P., Kafle, S., Park, S., Kim, S. J., Cho, L., & Kim, D. H. (2024). Advancements in sustainable thermochemical conversion of agricultural crop residues: A systematic review of technical progress, applications, perspectives, and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 202, 114723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114723

      Rahman, S. M. T., Hashan, A. M., Sharon, M. M. R., & Saha, S. (2024). Carbon footprint analysis of fossil power plants in Bangladesh: Measuring the impact of $${CO}_{2}$$ and greenhouse gas emissions. Discover Environment, 2(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00081-x

      Rahman, S. M. T., Saha, S., Worku, S. B., Ali, R. H., & Hashan, A. M. (2024). A Resource-Based Assessment of Renewable Energy Potential in Bangladesh: Challenges and Opportunities. OALib, 11(11), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112479

      Reva, V., Fonseca, L., Lousada, J. L., Abrantes, I., & Viegas, D. X. (2012). Impact of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, on gross calorific value and chemical composition of Pinus pinaster woody biomass. European Journal of Forest Research, 131(4), 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0574-5

      Sánchez, J., Curt, M. D., Robert, N., & Fernández, J. (2019). Biomass Resources. In The Role of Bioenergy in the Bioeconomy (pp. 25–111). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813056-8.00002-9

      Shadle, L. J., Indrawan, N., Breault, R. W., & Bennett, J. (2022). Gasification Technology. In M. Lackner, B. Sajjadi, & W.-Y. Chen (Eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (pp. 653–741). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72579-2_40

      Shaon, Md. T. R., Antor, M. H., & Sharon, Md. M. R. (2024). Non-Isothermal Thermogravimetric Analysis of Carbonation Reaction for Enhanced CO2 Capture. Measurement Standards. Reference Materials, 20(3), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2024-20-3-65-80

      Uddin, M. N., Techato, K., Taweekun, J., Rahman, M. M., Rasul, M. G., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Ashrafur, S. M. (2018). An Overview of Recent Developments in Biomass Pyrolysis Technologies. Energies, 11(11), 3115. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113115

      Wang, K., Zhang, H., Chu, S., & Zha, Z. (2021). Pyrolysis of single large biomass particle: Simulation and experiments. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2020.09.032

      You, S., Ok, Y. S., Tsang, D. C. W., Kwon, E. E., & Wang, C.-H. (2018). Towards practical application of gasification: A critical review from syngas and biochar perspectives. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 48(22–24), 1165–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1518860

      Янковский, С. А., & Кузнецов, Г. В. (2019). ОСОБЕННОСТИ ФИЗИКО-ХИМИЧЕСКИХ ПРЕВРАЩЕНИЙ СМЕСЕВЫХ ТОПЛИВ НА ОСНОВЕ ТИПИЧНЫХ КАМЕННЫХ УГЛЕЙ И ДРЕВЕСИНЫ ПРИ НАГРЕВЕ. Химия твердого топлива, (1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0023117719010080

      Downloads

      Published

      30-06-2026

      Data Availability Statement

      The data set can be available based upon request. The dataset is generated from the mass changes of the CaO-based carbonation reaction using a thermogravimetric analyzer in the department of Thermal Power Plant Engineering, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation.

      Issue

      Section

      ARTICLES

      How to Cite

      Md Tariqur Rahman, S., Md Mahabubur Rahman Sharon, & Altab Hossain. (2026). Impact of Biomass Particle Morphology on Pyrolysis and Gasification Processes: Insights from TGA and Reaction Kinetics. MIST INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 14(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.47981/j.mijst.14(01)2026.603(21-38)

      Similar Articles

      1-10 of 77

      You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

      Most read articles by the same author(s)